tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post1840643410257665326..comments2024-03-28T15:55:33.435-07:00Comments on The Big Study: A Subtle Thumbprint Of The UFOs ?The Professorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-81161502054255602912013-04-07T08:35:25.119-07:002013-04-07T08:35:25.119-07:00prof
in my opinion , you shouldnt lump all form o...prof<br /><br />in my opinion , you shouldnt lump all form of psychic ufo phenomena as trickster / magonia sourced. The magonia denizen , tricksters, little people, ghost/apparition for all we know might be their different mask they wear. as catholic you know what i am talking about, spirit of fallen angels who deceive mankind. there are multitude of these with different rank and task, personally i think the lowest rank are the trickster who love to scare humans, their higher ranks are what is known as angel of light that was mentioned in bible, that is a fallen angel pretending as an angel of light. Its this pretender that are the greatest deceiver of mankind.<br /><br />These beings or the agency behind the phenomena , they are spirits but they also can manifest physically on earth, as earth was to be their domain after their fall from heaven. Their primary task is to deceive mankind farther away from God and their UFO charade are meant to influence human's belief. Thats why you wont find any kind of proof whatsoever to UFO , the closer you think you get, the farther the phenomena ran away..<br /><br />off course all these are my own personal conclusion based on reading ufo cases and my Christian background. I am aware of the spiritual world around us and the danger involved if man try to play with spiritism, the simple example is playing with ouija board.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-82838944479372874432009-11-27T08:23:26.573-08:002009-11-27T08:23:26.573-08:00please forgive mistakes in spelling in these long-...please forgive mistakes in spelling in these long-distance comments---too much turkey and dressing fogs the brain.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-6290949439299102972009-11-27T08:18:11.344-08:002009-11-27T08:18:11.344-08:00This thought is certainly rational and people shou...This thought is certainly rational and people should test it to see what they can see. My experience so far is that the agency behind the UFO phenomenon seeks to deliberately destroy the "form follows function" rule as far as external obsevables are concerned. I've studied things like the "forms" of UFOs and beams-or-no-beams in vehicle interference cases [as mentioned in an earlier post]and found that the things seen are apparently irrelevent to the engine stoppages. Still, there may be subtler patterns, possibly resident as errors of agenda planning, which we may uncover by hard looking.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-1624458209368858302009-11-22T08:43:56.077-08:002009-11-22T08:43:56.077-08:00Form follows function, at least in our world. This...Form follows function, at least in our world. This holds true both for human creations as well as those of the natural world. Humans have created an enormous variety of aircraft in order to accomplish specific tasks: and even those which accomplish the same task, i.e. commercial airliners for example, evolve in form over time as well as vary at the present time. Would it be unreasonable to apply this principle to the phenomena as well? Doing so doesn't attempt to address the questions of "who" and "from where" but perhaps thinking about it as "what does this form seem suited for?" may provide an analytic framework. Perhaps form correlates with context as well in some pattern yet to be clearly delineated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-66646554451853613142009-11-21T10:49:24.517-08:002009-11-21T10:49:24.517-08:00My scanner has an absolute mind of its own on such...My scanner has an absolute mind of its own on such matters. Fred's axis is labelled in "blocks' rather than in some scale. The "blocks" are the kind of object reported. They go: no object//light//cigar//disc//other. Actually any axis which produced such a firm separation is very surprising and I can deal with this object-type separation fine. In a random business you would expect a size smear [up and down for any craft type] along that line or block, and you don't get it.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-63389899044680889532009-11-21T10:25:38.167-08:002009-11-21T10:25:38.167-08:00In the Merritt diagram the x axis labeling is clip...In the Merritt diagram the x axis labeling is clipped - what is there?<br /><br />Thanks professorUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07244506539270183969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-57391414890033930872009-11-20T16:29:32.265-08:002009-11-20T16:29:32.265-08:00Dear Frank, good to hear from you. In 1952 [you pr...Dear Frank, good to hear from you. In 1952 [you probably already know this but others might not] Donald Menzel came to the Pentagon to try to suck some support and money out of the air force for his anti-ufo machinations. General Garland, Psy-warfare expert Stefan Possony, Ed Ruppelt et al were too sharp for that and trashed Menzel's ideas. In a "secondary"[?] exchange between Menzel and Possony, the psy-war expert floated the idea of using UFOs as a psy-war tool due to the false projection/image ideas that Menzel was referring to. Menzel smelled a trick to get him to admit that his ideas might end up in a Classified situation and therefore being silenced. He said: "You mean like Jesus Christ over the Kremlin?!!" and angrily told them that they would not get him into that sort of discussion and that he would publish his anti-ufo ideas just as he pleased. I mention it to show that the ideas were well in the air.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-73957851126777488152009-11-20T16:08:58.545-08:002009-11-20T16:08:58.545-08:00The famous CIA spook of the Kennedy era, Lansdale,...The famous CIA spook of the Kennedy era, Lansdale, is supposed to have advocated projecting images of Jesus and other religious figures on clouds during the Bay of Pigs incursion into Cuba. If not an anti-Lansdale myth, it's a WASP stupidity re Roman Catholic "peasants". But centuries earlier, it would have worked--and been absorbed into the portent literature, for us, and I suspect for the Church hierarchy. It's all imitation Vallee, but what phenomena today fall neatly into "misconstruals" and "dismissals" files? Drat, where are James Jesus Angleton and Kim Philby when you need them...? Frank John ReidAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-71440311015117286032009-11-19T07:24:36.169-08:002009-11-19T07:24:36.169-08:00Let's hope that all Ray's years of work pa...Let's hope that all Ray's years of work pay off in good convincing data. All of us should be rooting on our colleagues to "score" in their various paths on this complexity.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-33752564246194814402009-11-19T07:11:13.640-08:002009-11-19T07:11:13.640-08:00From: A Different Anonymous Poster
Examination of...From: A Different Anonymous Poster<br /><br />Examination of the results from Ray Stanford's Project Starlight International shows that there is scientific data that can be collected. Hopefully he will write a book about it and share the largess of his work. There ARE subtle fingerprints in the data too, just as spectra in imagery can tell you alot about whether the object is ordinary terrestrial or not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-63106136109463556612009-11-18T08:31:14.022-08:002009-11-18T08:31:14.022-08:00I welcome your comments and agree with most of the...I welcome your comments and agree with most of them completely. It might be of some interest to go back to some of the earlier posts [ex. Mischief Makers, or the last What-will-they-be-like post, or the encounters with the Middle kingdom post (maybe even Wilde Shamrocks' picture-poem)] and you can see where we agree. My two UFO buddies and I, on our Sunday evening "explorations" in the files, have a list of about a dozen hypothesis categories that we keep in mind when probing into a particular encounter. Most of the time the case sounds like anomalous aerial technology. Some of the time it sounds like trickster-ism. On very rare occasions it sounds like something diabolical or merely parapsychological/spiritual. Once in a while there is something so meaningless and apparently non-directed that it seems like some sort of "intrusion" from GOD-only-knows where. We absolutely refuse to succumb to the [for us, irrational] temptation to forge a Universal Theory of UFO Files without a very powerful reason for doing so. We think that the urge to produce such a theory has led some smart people into strange, and wrong, waters. The nice thing about our "attitude" is that we're ready to be wrong as well.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-28431890493219892662009-11-18T07:05:51.879-08:002009-11-18T07:05:51.879-08:00Professor,
I discovered this blog about a week ag...Professor,<br /><br />I discovered this blog about a week ago. I'm one of 'those people' who have a long-time interest in UFOs (and in fact I also collect the literature in the hope of assembling a comprehensive library before some of the earlier books on the subject vanish into history).<br /><br />Merritt's pattern work gives one key insight: there probably is NOT a single agency behind the phenomena. I've suspected for some time that it's possible that the cases that present as ETH are, in fact ETH, the obviously Magonian-created cases are in fact the Magonians/Tricksters, etc, etc. I believe it to be entirely possible that the Earth has had extraterestrial visitors who visit in waves (followup expeditions, perhaps?), who potentially lost a landing craft in 1947, and who might be just as puzzled by the Trickers as we are ourselves.<br /><br />This would explain the amount of confusion that seems to surround the subject.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2019724693487670016.post-28479979203410198252009-11-17T17:13:46.092-08:002009-11-17T17:13:46.092-08:00Sometimes the universe is just too weird. After po...Sometimes the universe is just too weird. After posting this stuff, and going up to make some phone calls and act like I was part of the real world, I happened to pick an old reference off the shelf, and there was Fred Merritt writing a paper on his trace pattern work. So, for any of you owning a copy of the CUFOS 1976 Symposium Proceedings, and already knowing all this, I apologize. I found that neither Fred's paper nor Mark Rodeghier's IUR reprint of it [nor Mark's insightful remarks therein] talk about this work in the same way that I did here, so maybe it wasn't a waste afterall. Still, a couple of hours later the thing falls in my lap...leprechauns again.The Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07811807639219365621noreply@blogger.com